Tomorrow, the world will watch the lastest episode of a long-term soap-opera involving conservatives and Islamist terrorism. The UK will hold a controversial general election that will be definitive in the fight against Islamist terrorism.
Over the years, western society has assumed that conservative parties such as the Tories in the UK are more reliable than the lefties in the fight against terrorism. In recent times, however, there has been clear evidence that ISIS and conservative forces have been helping each other.
ISIS has used terrorism to spread chaos worldwide and thereby influence elections in Western democracies. Conservative forces have used this chaos to bolster racism and use the ready-made fear campaigns for their own ends, to ensure their re-election.
Recently, Theresa May has used the latest terrorist attack in London to launch a manipulative fear campaign to improve her chances of winning the election. Additionally, she has announced measures that purport to improve security but will not, and will bolster racism in UK society, which is the ultimate goal of ISIS.
Theresa May is trying to adopt the ploys used by George W. Bush’s campaign during his re-election in 2004. Bush was one of the first conservative world leaders to use terrorism as a tool to win elections and cause destruction overseas.
Bush had the lowest presidential approval ratings ever recorded in 2004 as a consequence of the Iraq War. Though most pundits contended that he did not have any chance of being re-elected in the presidential election that same year, he launched a mass “fear campaign” based on two points:
1. Vote for me, and you will be safe.
2. Vote for someone else, and terrorist forces will invade your country.
Bush’s fear campaign proved successful when he was re-elected. Within a few weeks, Americans started thinking that “Muslims” represented a real threat to their lives. As a result, there was an increase in the number of racial attacks across the US. This was later used by ISIS to attract new combatants. It targeted those “Muslims” who were born in the US and had suffered from harassment, intolerance, and racial attacks. That created hundreds of potential new terrorists ready to commit terrorist attacks in the US and the UK.
Theresa May, who is now following in the footsteps of Bush, could cause a catastrophe if she became Prime Minister. ISIS is actively helping her to win this election through terrorism. ISIS knows that terrorism bolsters conservative forces, which tend to react by using an anti-immigration narrative, leading to an increase in racial attacks. This is the best scenario for ISIS to recruit new militants. Consequently, it is clear that conservative parties cannot lead the fight against terrorism any longer.
Furthermore, May is still endorsing Saudi Arabia -the main state sponsor of terrorism in the Middle East- and led a cut off of 20,000 police officers as home secretary, leading terrorists to circumvent British security surveillance. For that reason, anyone who is still thinking of voting for May should think twice before casting their votes.
Jeremy Corbyn has made numerous mistakes during his life, like everyone else. However, he has spent most of his life by trying to integrate immigrants and unite UK society. If he became Prime Minister, he would commit more resources to security forces, allow them to monitor potential terrorists, thus resulting in a substantial reduction of terrorist attacks in the UK. This election is all about two options:
1. Theresa May: An increase in the number of terrorist attacks.
2. Jeremy Corbyn: A reduction of terrorist attacks.
If you are by chance a British person reading this piece, you must know that this is your time to take action to build a better world. Think about the aforementioned two options and vote for the better one, and remember that Corbyn’s victory would make the UK safer. In a certain way, the destiny of Europe, western countries, and the world is in your hands!
Note: In this opinion, piece I refer to the political class that represents conservative organizations. So I assume that not all conservative supporters endorse any sort of collaboration with Islamist terrorism.
I’ll be voting for labour tomorrow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such an insightful post. Really has broaden my perspective even though I’m not directly impacted as I’m in South Africa.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Sharp and Pointed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Should the Conservatives lose, there’s no doubt that May’s decision to call an election will go down as one of the most foolish ever. I’m no fan of Corbyn, either. I would say our prime minister, Trudeau, is the better man. Good luck tomorrow!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s a fair analysis, but the British political landscape is confused because of the impact of last year’s referendum decision to leave the EU. Remainers and leavers both came from across the political spectrum with the only clear divisions being young (remain) vs old (leave) and bigger cities (remain) vs small towns and rural areas (leave). That resulted in a partial realignment of party preferences so there’s some ambiguity about the likely outcome – or the size of the Copnservative victory in reality. Despite recent events, terrorism isn’t really a political issue for electoral purposes – it’s more to to with the impact of austerity on police numbers and the reduced resources available for health, social care, eductaion, hoiusing and defence. Goog blog thouigh. An engaging read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think some of your analysis apply to many countries in the world, even India, where right wing government has come to power.
LikeLiked by 1 person